How do you ensure consistent quality in formative, internal reviews? A full QM review is a significant investment of time and funds -- How can you be confident that a course and a faculty member are “ready” before they go up for a full review? This situation is faced by many QM institutions. In this moderated panel, QM Coordinators from three universities (New Mexico State, Texas A&M International, and Indiana) will compare and contrast how they have approached this challenge.
Topics covered include faculty buy-in, review structures, funding models, use of QM professional development opportunities, and more.
This handout provides:
- each panelist's answers to our 4 guiding questions
- links to publicly available resources from each institution
- links to email the presenters